The Flaws in SLG and its Relatives

Slugging Percentage is a flawed stat because it divides TB by AB's. What's wrong with this? Most MLB players have more AB's than TB's but what if they didn't? What if player X got called up to the majors and in his first 11 PA's had 10 walks, 1 homer, 10 steals and 10 caught stealings, this would mean player X's SLG would be 24/1=24 yes he would average 24 total bases per at-bat. How is this possible? It's not, that's why SLG is flawed. TB(total bases) includes walks which AB's don't, only PA's include walks. Since SLG is flawed ISO is also flawed because ISO is just SLG-AVG. Also, what's the point of OPS? It just adds OBP and SLG, that's like adding 2B and RBI's and calling it a stat. It has no meaning whatsoever.

My proposed ways to fix these problems are:
a) To change SLG to (TB-CS)/PA this way you can't have someone averaging more than 4 total bases per PA/AB
b) To get rid of OPS or to equalize OBP and SLG and then average them(or something like that)
c) To change ISO's formula from SLG-AVG to [(TB-BB-HBP-SB)/AB]-AVG=ISO+(my invention)

Baseball's old stats have so many flaws it's ridiculous. I'm just pointing out one but there are many more like OBP(arguable), RBI's, Defensive Stats, Saves, Holds and ERA. Baseball Prospectus is putting together many stats that solve these problems like EqA(equivalent average, accounts for all offensive facets) for OBP, EqR(equivalent runs) for RBI's, FRAR(fielding runs above replacement) for D stats, NRA(normalized run average) for ERA and Leverage(measures game importance based on the level it was at when the game started) for bullpen appearances. I think everyone should put all these phony stats behind us and start using these new clear stats.